Bridging the Digital Divide in Helmond

A blogpost by Negar Noori
Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity

In an era marked by rapid urbanization and digitalization, the pursuit of inclusive prosperity in cities necessitates the thoughtful integration of vulnerable societal groups into the digital landscape. The challenge at hand is the formulation of targeted policies capable of addressing the diverse dimensions of digital inclusion, which is why for the past two years the Erasmus Initiative “Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity” and the City of Helmond have been collaborating in a joint project on empowering Digital Inclusion in Helmond.

A Symphony of Inclusion

As the cityscape transforms, the challenge becomes evident: how to craft policies that could reach into the diverse corners of society and address the multifaceted dimensions of digital inclusion? To find answers to this question the City of Helmond reached out to the Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity, and together they laid out a course for  "Fostering Digital Inclusion in Helmond." This was not just a project; it was a commitment to weaving a narrative where no voice goes unheard in the digital chorus.

Navigating the Digital Challenges

As urbanization and digitalization intertwine, the management of cities becomes pivotal for fostering inclusive prosperity. It is about more than just technological advancement; it is about ensuring that no vulnerable group is left on the periphery in this digital age. The threat of exclusion, fueled by factors such as age, ability, education, income, gender, and location, needed to be tackled head-on to prevent the seeds of inequality from sprouting in the access to public services.

Right from the start we recognized that encouraging digital adoption across diverse societal groups is paramount for active participation in the digital realm. The journey had begun.

But it wasn’t a journey to be taken lightly. We embarked on a two-fold approach. First, we crafted a theoretical framework through a theoretical study and bibliometric analysis. Then, we validated this framework through a citizen survey and participatory workshops for governmental and non-governmental stakeholders right in the heart of Helmond, Netherlands.

Key Dimensions of Digital Inclusion

As the tale unfolded, we presented a theoretical framework with four dimensions crucial for digital inclusion. Each dimension held the key to unlocking barriers:

  • Usability: 
    This dimension focused on digital skills, literacy, and inclusive design. It emphasizes the effective engagement with digital technologies and designing digital solutions for diverse user groups.
  • Suitability:
    Characterized by digital adoption, privacy, and security, this dimension emphasizes active participation and the fostering of a safe and trusted digital environment. The aim is not just inclusion but inclusion with dignity.
  • Accessibility:
    Ensuring equitable access with high-speed internet connection and adequate devices, this dimension enables individuals to fully participate in digital activities, irrespective of their geographical or physical constraints.
  • Affordability:
    Considering network efficiency and subsidized services, this dimension addresses cost-effectiveness, providing affordable digital services to overcome financial barriers. It is about ensuring that economic status does not dictate one's digital journey.
  • Shaping Inclusive Policies Through Collaboration:
    In our quest to unravel the nuances of digital inclusion, our participatory workshops engaged both policymakers and non-governmental stakeholders. In the workshops, a symphony of voices resonated – policymakers, non-governmental stakeholders, and citizens alike. Citizen surveys and participatory workshops became the compass, guiding our way further through uncharted territories.

Our exploration into the realms of digital inclusion within the city of Helmond has yielded compelling insights. A comparative analysis of the citizen survey outcomes and participatory workshops involving policymakers and a diverse range of non-governmental actors uncovered an unanimous acknowledgment of the crucial role digital inclusion policies play for all identified social groups.

Facilitating meaningful dialogue and fostering a shared language enabled a convergence of perspectives among key stakeholders. The nuanced clusters of social groups identified provided invaluable insights, offering a tailored approach to policy formulation.

The Shared Emphasis: Security, Privacy, and Inclusive Design

Policymakers and non-governmental stakeholders, though often seen as different guilds, found a common ground. They underscored the pivotal importance of digital security, inclusive design, and digital privacy. These were not mere checkboxes in a policy; they were the guardians of a secure digital environment.

The consensus echoed through the town square – digital security was not just about mitigating risks, but about instilling confidence. In a world rife with cyber threats, from phishing attacks to data breaches, safeguarding privacy isn’t just a policy point; it is the key to sustaining citizen engagement with public services.

A Tale of Age and Inclusive Literacy

As the narrative unfolded, age emerged as a key protagonist. The findings resonated with the wider world – digital literacy programs had to acknowledge the unique needs and challenges faced by different age groups. To design effective policies, one had to recognize the nuances of each chapter in life's journey.

Cross-stakeholders Consensus

Upon comparing insights and outcomes, a harmonious consensus emerged among academia, policymakers, and non-governmental stakeholders, accentuating the paramount significance of societal groups in shaping digital inclusion policies. The collective wisdom gave rise to two distinct clusters, each with its own priority:

  • Cluster One: Seniors, Low-income Groups, Persons with Impairments, and Transients & Migrants
    This cluster stood as the beacon of highest priority. It represented the voices of those often at the margins, demanding focused attention and tailored strategies to ensure their digital inclusion.
  • Cluster Two: Youth, Children, and Women
    Securing the second priority, this cluster encapsulated the future and the nurturing of generations to come. While not to be overshadowed, it underlined the need for inclusive policies catering to the unique digital needs of the youth, children, and women.

The four dimensions – usability, suitability, accessibility, and affordability – aren't just elements; they are the pillars supporting the city's digital transformation. Each pillar holds the promise of a more inclusive and equitable digital landscape for all residents of Helmond.

Researcher
Dr. Negar Noori

Compare @count study programme

  • @title

    • Duration: @duration
Compare study programmes