More information
Work
- Jeff Rachlinski (2017) - How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Nudges Cass R. Sunstein's The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science - Texas Law Review, 95 (5), 1061-1076 - [link]
- AJ Wistrich & Jeff Rachlinski (2017) - Implicit Bias in Judicial Decision Making How It Affects Judgment and What Judges Can Do About It (March 16, 2017). Chapter 5: American Bar Association, Enhancing Justice - doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2934295
- Jeff Rachlinski & AJ Wistrich (2017) - Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges - Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2017 (13), 203-229 - doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085032 - [link]
- Jeff Rachlinski, AJ Wistrich & C Guthrie (2017) - Judicial Politics and Decisionmaking: A New Approach - Vanderbilt Law Review, 70 (6), 2015-2103 - [link]
- Jeff Rachlinski (2015) - Does Empirical Legal Studies Shed More Heat than Light? - Ratio Juris (An International journal of jurisprudence and philosophy of law), 28 (4)
- Jeff Rachlinski, AJ Wistrich & C Guthrie (2015) - Can Judges Make Reliable Numeric Judgements? Distorted Damages and Skewed Sentences - Indiana Law Journal, 90 (2), 695-739
- AJ Wistrich, Jeff Rachlinski & C Guthrie (2015) - Heart Versus Head: Do judges Follow the Law or Follow Their Feelings? - Texas Law Review, 93 (855), 856-923
- Jeff Rachlinski, AJ Wistrich & C Guthrie (2013) - Altering Attention in Adjudication - UCLA Law Review, 60 (6), 1586-1619
- Jeff Rachlinski, C Guthrie & AJ Wistrich (2013) - Contrition in the Courtroom: Do Apologies Affect Adjudication? - Cornell Law Review, 2013 (paper 604), 1189-1243
- AJ Wistrich & Jeff Rachlinski (2013) - How Lawyer's Intuitions Prolong Litigation - Southern California Law Review, 86 (571), 13-91
- Jeff Rachlinski (2020) - Judging Autonomous Vehicles (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - Dag Van Het Oordeel ('Judgment Day') (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - How Judges Think (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - Inside the Judicial Mind: How Judges Decide Cases (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - Predictable Misjudgment: How Intuition Misleads Lawyers, Judges and Other (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - Inside the Judicial Mind: How Judges Decide Cases (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - Why Heightened Pleading - Why Now? (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - The Working of the Judicial Mind (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - Intuition, Deliberation and Good Judgment (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic - Jeff Rachlinski (2011) - Psychological Factors Affecting Judicial and Administrative Decision-making (Speaker)
Activity: Oral presentation › Academic
Cornell University USA
- Start date approval
- September 2014
- End date approval
- December 9999
- Place
- ITHACA
- Description
- Hoogleraar
